THE ALGORITHMS APPLIED IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Autori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62140/RF1992024

Parole chiave:

Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Presumption Innocence Principle; Full Defense; Impartiality.

Abstract

This article will discuss the effectiveness of the use of algorithms in Criminal Procedure Law, from the lenses of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Criminal Law, and recommendations of the European Union about Artificial Intelligence. In light of the principles of Criminal Procedure, Artificial Intelligence will be confronted with fundamental guarantees that the Rule of Law ensures to the individual. The disruptive technologies presented in the last decades have generated incessant debate, not only legal-academic, but also in study groups where different skills of knowledge are present. The text is constructed through the research of texts not only from the perspective of Law, but also of Technology and Mathematics. The elaboration of the chapters begins by discussing the answer in the exact sciences, as to whether machines can think, in the next chapter it analyzes the prism of Law and Technology with a focus on algorithmic perception. And brings to the reader an analysis of the conflict of the binary system and the magistrate's decision based on the subjective aspects of the conduct of the author of the action typified as a crime. Although I may at any moment bring to this analysis research carried out in scientific articles and international authors, it will be exclusively with the objective of collaborating in the construction of a clear answer to the reader. Some points will be highlighted, such as understanding the technical nomenclature, current legislation, and studies that point to the relevance of the subject in the face of the principles of Criminal Procedural Law.

Biografia autore

  • Rosinara Ferreira, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

    Rosinara Ferreira Advogada BR e PT, Bacharel em Direito (PUCRS, 2018), Pós-graduada em Direito Penal e Criminologia (PUCRS, 2021). Especialista em Finanças Investimento & Banking (PUCRS, 2021). Pós-graduada em Direito Empresarial e Tecnologia (Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2022). Mestranda em Direito e Tecnologia (Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2023). CURRÍCULO LATTES: https://lattes.cnpq.br/2283238707044262.

Riferimenti bibliografici

PORTUGAL. Ac. Tribunal Constitucional nº 632/2008. Diário da República nº 6 Série I de 09/01/2009. Base de Dados Juridica. 23 de December de 2008. Disponível em: http://bdjur.almedina.net/item.php?field=item_id&value=1350449. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

ALONSO, Aristides Ledesma. A máquina de Turing e a máquina do Revirão: computar, calcular e pensar. Lumina, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 2, 2008. DOI: 10.34019/1981-4070.2008.v2.20966. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/lumina/article/view/20966. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2022.

ANNONI, Alessandro; et al. Inteligência Artificial: Uma Perspectiva Europeia, Craglia, M. editor(es), EUR 29425 EN, Serviço das Publicações da União Europeia, Luxemburgo, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-97219-5, doi:10.2760/936974 , JRC113826. Disponível em: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC113826. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

ARRUDA, Ana Julia Pozzi, RESENDE, Ana Paula Bougleux Andrade e FERNANDES, Fernando Andrade. Reflexões Acerca dos Valores Relacionados à Incorporação da Inteligência Artificial no Direito Penal. ACADEMIA. [Online] 2021.Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/70218658/Reflex%C3%B5es_Acerca_dos_Valores_Relacionados_%C3%A0_Incorpora%C3%A7%C3%A3o_da_Intelig%C3%AAncia_Artificial_no_Direito_Penal. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2022.

Bartneck, Christoph; Lütge, Christoph; Wagner, Alan; Welsh, Sean. Trust and Fairness in AI Systems. In: An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI. [Online] 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4_4. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de Dezembro de 1940. Código Civil. Brasília,

DF: Presidência da República, [1940]. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm.

Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

BUSATO, Paulo Cesar. Direito penal: parte geral. 2a. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.

CALIENDO, Paulo Velloso da Silveira. ÉTICA E INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL: da possibilidade filosófica de agentes morais artificiais. ESCOLA DE HUMANIDADES PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM FILOSOFIA, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do RS - PUCRS. Porto Alegre, RS: s.n., 2020.

CARVALHO, SALO. Penas e medidas de segurança no Direito Penal Brasileiro. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.

BIG DATE and Analytics: Seeking Foundations for Effective Privacy Guidanc. In: Centre for Information Policy Leadership. [Online] February de 2013. Disponível em: https://www.huntonak.com/files/Uploads/Documents/News_files/Big_Data_and_Analytics_February_2013.pdf. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS OF EUROPE. Recommendation CM/Rec(2020)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems. Council of Europe. [Online] 8 de April de 2020. Disponível em: https://search.coe.int/cm/pages/result_details.aspx?objectid=09000016809e1154. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. ALGORITHMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques and possible regulatory implications. COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON INTERNET INTERMEDIARIES (MSI-NET). s.l.: Council of Europe, 2018.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Guide on Article 13 (Right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights. [Online] 31 de December de 2021. Disponível em:

https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_13_ENG.pdf. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. Sistema acusatório: cada parte no lugar constitucionalmente demarcado. Revista de informação legislativa, v. 46, n. 183, p. 103-115, 2009.

INSTRUÇÃO (Processo penal). DRE - DIÁRIO DA REPÚBLICA ELETRÔNICO. [Online] 2022. Disponível em: https://dre.pt/dre/lexionario/termo/instrucao-processo-penal. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2022.

DUPONT, Benoît; STEVENS, Yuan e WESTERMANN, Hannes. Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Crime and Criminal Justice. International Centre for Comparative Criminology. 2018. Disponível em: URL:https://www.cicc-iccc.org/en. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service. Understanding algorithmic decision-making: Opportunities. European Parliament Search. 05 de March de 2019. Disponível em: www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2019)624261. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Proposta de Regulamento do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho que Estabelece Regras Harmonizadas sobre Inteligência Artificial (Lei De Inteligência Artificial) e que altera alguns Atos Legislativos da União. EUR-LEX. EUROPEAN COMISSION. 21 de April de 2021. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1623335154975&uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. 31 de December de 2021. Disponível em:

https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

EUROPEAN JUSTICE. Tribunais princípios gerais. 2021. Disponível em: https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_judicial_systems_in_member_states-16-pt-maximizeMS-pt.do?member=1. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 27 April 2016. Official Journal of the European Union. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforce. Official Journal of the European Union. Disponível em: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1215/2015-02-26. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

EUROPEAN UNION. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2000. Disponível em: https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government_in_ireland/european_government/eu_law/charter_of_fundamental_rights.html. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi. 2002. Direito e razão: teoria do garantismo penal. Revista dos Tribunais. 2002.

FRANSSEN, Vanessa; BERRENDORF, Alyson. The Use of Ai Tools in Criminal Courts: Justice Done and Seen to be Done? Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, v. 92, n. 1, pág. 199-223, 2021. Disponível em: https://hdl.handle.net/2268/264969. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

FURTADO, Miguel. Segurança Jurídica. 04 de March de 2019. Acesso em: https://www.isg.pt/2019/03/04/seguranca-juridica/. Disponível em 10 abr. 2022.

GSENGER, Rita; STRLE, Toma. Trust, automation bias and aversion: algorithmic decision-making in the context of credit scoring. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, v. 19, n. 4, p. 542-560, 2021. Disponível em: https://indecs.eu/2021/indecs2021-p. 542-560.pdf. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

HAJEK, Petr. Fuzzy Logic The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Online] 2021. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=logic-fuzzy. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2022.

HAO, Karen. AI still doesn’t have the common sense to understand human language. MIT Technology Review. [Online] 30 de January de 2020. Disponível em: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/01/31/304844/ai-common-sense- reads-human-language-ai2. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

IEEE Standards. The Ethics Certification Program for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (ECPAIS). IEEE Standards Association. 2020. Disponível em: https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ecpais/. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2022.

ISO. Standards by ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 AI. International Organization for Standardization. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475/x/catalogue/. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2022.

KARSAI, Krisztina. Algorithmic Decisions Within The Criminal Justice Ecosystem And Their Problem Matrix. Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Automated Decision-Making in Criminal Justice. 2021. Acesso em: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8740153. Disponível em: 10 abr. 2022.

KRYSIA, Joasia. Notebook 055 Ada Lovelace. January de 2012.

LESLIE, David et al. Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law: a primer. Available on SSRN 3817999, 2021.

LOPES JR, Aury. Direito Processual Penal. s.l.: Saraiva, 2015.

LOPES Jr., Aury. Direito processual penal. [ed.] Saraiva Educação. São Paulo: s.n., 2019.

MARTINS, Ronaldo; SANTOS, Mirian. 2013. Podem as máquinas falar? Série e-urbano. Vol. 2, 2013.

MCKINSEY & COMPANY. Quantum computing: An emerging ecosystem and industry use cases. December de 2021. Disponível em: www.mckinsey.com. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

MIRANDA, Jorge. Manual de direito constitucional: direitos fundamentais. Coimbra: s.n.. p. 259-260. Vols. Tomo IV. 2000.

OLIVEIRA, Alexandre Luiz Alves. A Dignidade da Pessoa Humana e o Princípio da Presunção de Inocência Penal. Belo Horizonte: s.n., 2020.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS). American Convention on Human Rights Pact of San Jose Costa Rica (B-32). REFWORLD | The Leader in Refugee Decision Support. 22 de January de 1969. Disponível em: https://www.refworld.org/docid/50ca189b2.html. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2022.

PELUSO, Cezar. É preciso entender a grandeza do princípio da presunção de inocência.

CONJUR. 26 de September de 2016. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2016-set-26/peluso-preciso-entender-grandeza-presuncao-inocencia. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2022.

PERSAK, Nina. Automated Justice and its Limits: Irreplaceable Human(E) Dimensions Of Criminal Justice. 2021. Disponível em: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8740160/file/8740161.pdf. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2022.

PORTUGAL. Decreto-Lei n.º 78/87, de 17 de Fevereiro CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO PENAL. PGDL - Procuradoria-Geral Distrital de Lisboa. 1987. Disponível em: https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?ficha=301&artigo_id=&nid=199&pagina=4&tabela=leis&nversao=&so_miolo=. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2022.

PORTUGAL. Decreto-Lei n.º 78/87, de 17 de Fevereiro - art 287. PGDL - Procuradoria-Geral Distrital de Lisboa. 17 de Feb de 1987. Disponível em: https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?artigo_id=199A0287&nid=199&tabela=leis&pagina=1&ficha=1&nversao=%23artigo. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2022.

PORTUGAL. Legislação Penal Portuguesa. PGDL. Procuradoria-Geral Distrital de Lisboa. 04 de September de 1995. Disponível em: https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=109&tabela=leis. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2022.

REALE Jr., Miguel. Penas e medidas de segurança no novo código. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1987.

SARKER, Iqbal H.; FURHAD, Md Hasan & NOWROZY, Raza. AI-Driven Cybersecurity: An Overview, Security Intelligence Modeling and Research Directions. [Online] 26 de March de 2021. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42979-021-00557-0. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2022.

TRACE3. AI, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. s.l.: IDG Communications, 2019.

VORONOVA, Sófija. Artificial intelligence in criminal law. Think Tank - European Parliament. [Online] 30 de September de 2021. Disponível em: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_ATA(2021)698039. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2022.

Pubblicato

2025-12-11

Fascicolo

Sezione

Artigos Completos

Come citare

THE ALGORITHMS APPLIED IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. (2025). Revista Ibérica Do Direito, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.62140/RF1992024