Constitutional judges, politics and judicial deference

Authors

  • Rodrigo Andrés Poyanco Bugueño Universidad Finis Terrae

Keywords:

judicial activism, judicial deference, constitutional juez, Parliament, Policy, law

Abstract

When the constitutional jury impersonates through its sentences a certain ideology, in detriment of others that are legitimately battling democratic democracy, it does not ignore the essential differences between Politics and Derecho, a bell that compromises the competences of Parliament and, finally , the political autonomy of society. In the face of it, the doctrine of judicial deference in the limits of jurisprudence and constitutional doctrine as tools of solution in the face of political problems and the importance of preserving the proper and distinctive function of the Constitutional Derecho.

Author Biography

  • Rodrigo Andrés Poyanco Bugueño, Universidad Finis Terrae

    Abogado de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso; Magíster en Derecho Constitucional por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, España. Profesor de Derecho Constitucional y Político en la Universidad Finis Terrae, en Santiago de Chile.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-17

Issue

Section

Vol. 1 N.º 1 (1): 2020

How to Cite

Constitutional judges, politics and judicial deference. (2021). Revista Ibérica Do Direito, 1(1), 95-118. https://revistaibericadodireito.pt/index.php/capa/article/view/29

Similar Articles

11-20 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.